Tuesday, September 9, 2008

We discussed today in class that some of us hated the idea that every building might fill the visitor with emotion. Thinking about it later and in reading the other blogs, I believe that emotion is critical to the sensory experience and comprehension of the building, but conversely when overwhelmed, we tend to become numb to our environments. "We live through sensory experience," and I think that emotion is how our brains process that information as a memory tool- our understanding of our environments in relation to us. Most all buildings give us the mundane 'numb' reaction where the few unique buildings we get to visit will revive our emotion. I think in architecture heightens our awareness and reactions. I think all buildings should create some stirring of emotion within us, but degree and appropriateness is what we can use to gauge value.

1 comment:

luis said...

it occurred to me that the statement "architecture heightens our awareness and reactions" is really quite charged and interesting. i know that much of these ruminations are reactions to what we are talking/thinking in class... how important are these ideas for your thesis? [having, of course, said that i don't know what your thesis is - as i couldn't read it]

and, also, what about the recycling bit?

it occurred to me last nite that the definition of hackitecture (that i mentioned by chance in the last class) was a variant of recycling ... no?

one takes an existing architecture/urbanism and "hacks" it (subverts it and its meaning). isn't that one version of recycling (re-cycling; re introducing into the cycle, etc.)